🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.